by jiawen
Share
Share
by jiawen
Share
Share
With the increasing number of asset managers setting up fund management companies in Singapore, the financial institutions are becoming more vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing. A wide range of financial services offered by financial institutions become attractive to criminals when they attempt to exploit the gaps in AML/CFT systems to launder the proceeds of crime or finance terrorism. In August 2022, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has published an information paper to set out the good AML/CFT practices for external asset managers (EAMs). This paper is also applicable to all fund management companies and can be a source of reference when reviewing their internal AML/CFT frameworks.
Key Areas Covered in the Information Paper
No. 1: Governance
- Board and senior management play an important role in setting the right tone from the top and fostering a strong AML/CFT culture
- Establishment of a three lines of defence model to maintain a sound AML/CFT risk management
- Ensure that the staff especially those from the compliance team and internal audit function are aware of the regulatory developments and latest AML/CFT matters
No. 2: Risk Assessment Frameworks
- Review the Enterprise-wide Risk Assessment (EWRA) on a periodic basis
- To assess the relevant risk factors such as customer risk profile, delivery channels and type of products and services offered
- Ensure consistency of the rating framework applied at the individual customer level and the enterprise-wide level
No. 3: Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
- Conduct ongoing screening to identify adverse news associated with an individual or its relevant parties
- Perform transaction monitoring across multiple accounts held under the same individual to promptly detect and report any suspicious or unusual transaction patterns
- Periodic review of business relations that covers the relevant ML/TF risk areas such as (i) changes in existing customers’ CDD data, documents and information, (ii) outcomes of screening checks, and (iii) results of transaction monitoring
No. 4: Enhanced CDD
- Perform enhanced CDD measures on customers with high ML/TF risks including PEPs, close relatives of PEPs
- Adequate corroboration of customer’s source of wealth (SOW) and source of funds (SOF)
No. 5: Suspicious Transactions Reporting (STR)
- To file an STR with the Suspicious Transaction Reporting Office (STRO) whenever there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the transaction or activity could involve money laundering or terrorist financing
Summary
Last month, the MAS has imposed a composition penalty of $375,000 on a capital markets services (CMS) licensee for failing to comply with business conduct and AML/CFT requirements. The breaches of AML/CFT requirements include its failure to conduct proper due diligence which may hinder the detection of any suspicious transactions as well as its failure to verify customers’ source of wealth especially those who present a higher ML/TF risk. In conclusion, all financial institutions including the CMS licence holders should implement appropriate AML/CFT frameworks and controls commensurate with the nature of their products/ services and the profile of their customers.
How We Can Help
- Review existing AML/CFT policy to ensure company’s regulatory compliance
- Assist to draft a new AML/CFT policy that aligns with MAS requirements
- Provide Compliance & AML Training
- Provide ongoing compliance advice
Reference Materials
Monetary Authority of Singapore (2022). ‘Strengthening AML/CFT Practices for External Asset Managers’. Available at: https://www.mas.gov.sg/-/media/MAS-Media-Library/publications/monographs-or-information-paper/CMI1/2022/Strengthening-AML_CFT-Practices-for-External-Asset-Managers.pdf
Yong, H.T. (2022). ‘UOB Kay Hian fined S$375,000 for business conduct compliance failures’, The Business Times, 1 September. Available at: https://www.businesstimes.com.sg/companies-markets/uob-kay-hian-fined-s375000-business-conduct-compliance-failures
A surprising number of Capital Markets Services (CMS) licensees in Singapore are still operating on the compliance policy manual they drafted at the point of licensing — sometimes years earlier, with no formal review in between. Keeping policies current is not a bureaucratic nicety; it is one of the more common gaps that surfaces during
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) can take a range of enforcement actions for breaches of the laws it administers — reprimands, composition penalties, prohibition orders, civil penalties, and referrals for criminal prosecution. MAS’s own stated enforcement priorities for 2025–26 centre on market misconduct, AML/CFT failures, and technology risk. A review of MAS’s recent
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published a consultation paper on 10 June 2026 proposing amendments to the MAS Notices on Technology Risk Management. The consultation closes at 11.30 PM on 31 July 2026—giving MAS-regulated firms just under two months to assess the proposed changes and, where warranted, submit a formal response. This article explains
About the Author: jiawen
A surprising number of Capital Markets Services (CMS) licensees in Singapore are still operating on the compliance policy manual they drafted at the point of licensing — sometimes years earlier, with no formal review in between. Keeping policies current is not a bureaucratic nicety; it is one of the more common gaps that surfaces during
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) can take a range of enforcement actions for breaches of the laws it administers — reprimands, composition penalties, prohibition orders, civil penalties, and referrals for criminal prosecution. MAS’s own stated enforcement priorities for 2025–26 centre on market misconduct, AML/CFT failures, and technology risk. A review of MAS’s recent
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) published a consultation paper on 10 June 2026 proposing amendments to the MAS Notices on Technology Risk Management. The consultation closes at 11.30 PM on 31 July 2026—giving MAS-regulated firms just under two months to assess the proposed changes and, where warranted, submit a formal response. This article explains
